|
81 N.Y.2d 1002, 615 N.E.2d 1020, 599 N.Y.S.2d 536 (Cite as: 81 N.Y.2d 1002, 615 N.E.2d 1020)Court of Appeals of New York. Commercial landlord brought declaratory judgment action for determination that sales tax was inapplicable to rent inclusion charges for nonmetered electricity services supplied to its tenants. The Supreme Court, New York County, Cohen, J., 150 Misc.2d 747, 570 N.Y.S.2d 419, entered judgment for landlord. State Department of Taxation and Finance appealed. The Supreme Court, Appellate Division, 185 A.D.2d 201, 586 N.Y.S.2d 597, affirmed. On further review, the Court of Appeals held that imposition of sales tax on tenants' payment to landlord of electricity rent inclusion factor as sale of utility services was improper. Affirmed. OPINION OF THE COURTMEMORANDUM Plaintiff's tenants' payment of an Electricity Rent Inclusion Factor (ERIF) was for electric service provided only as an incident to the rental of commercial premises in plaintiff's building and not as part of “separate transactions which have *1004 as their primary purpose the furnishing of utilities or utility services” (Debevoise & Plimpton v. New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin., 80 N.Y.2d 657, 661, 593 N.Y.S.2d 974, 609 N.E.2d 514). The taxing of the ERIF payments as a sale of utility services under Tax Law § 1105(b) was therefore improper. KAYE, C.J., and SIMONS, TITONE, HANCOCK and BELLACOSA, JJ., concur. N.Y.,1993. |









